On Navalny, Kisin and a little hair sniffing
Can you sort these out:
"Life is Too Short to Look the Other Way" - Alexei Navalny (konstantinkisin.com)
Freddie Sayers and Konstantin Kisin: What happened to Tucker Carlson?
New sanctions on Russia mark two years of invasion (rumble.com)
Scott Ritter: The TRUTH is Out on Alexei Navalny and Putin Wins
What do YOU think you know about Navalny and his death? A short while ago I had a rather heated argument with three drunk 20-something boys who were quite vocal about Putin, the war and the death of Navalny. Considering the vehemence of their emotions and their level of understanding of the facts, I would not have stood a chance even if they were sober.
Let me make it easier for you by summing up the facts:
Navalny was the CIA/WEF designated successor puppet of Putin. He also happened to be a thief.
When he started to flex his CIA supported anti-Putin muscles, he was investigated for his very real crimes, but let go with a slap on the hand in the form of a suspended sentence. It was a warning he did not heed. He did the fake poisoning circus in London, which was sold by the Western press so well, that it propelled his popularity to its highest level ever. Still, he was NEVER a leader of any credible opposition.
The only real opposition Putin has is the Communist Party with less than 20% of the votes.
The day Navalny died, his wife just happened to be in Strassburg, ready to make statements. A few weeks later she flew to meet Joe Biden who already had a new sanctions package ready to ‘punish’ Russia. He dully sniffed her hair in a photo-op.
Amazing coincidences. Navalnaya is the new face of the democratic opposition, continuing her dead husband’s work ‘in exile’
Yulia Navalnaya Forges New Public Image After Navalny’s Death - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
If you bother to look into it, who do you believe: Scott Ritter or Konstantin Kisin?
You could also try to explain why don’t we see more push-back against such obvious, blatant propaganda?
Yes boys, I am talking to you…
This is what I think about Navalny, (from memory of reading the news), I am not going to look anything up.
I remember at first Navalny was an anti-corruption voice (in Russia). He did some Youtube pieces on the abundant assets of Medvedev, (drone fly-overs of country estates and the like), and asked where did he get those riches? I didn't see anything on Putin, but there may have been.
Of what possible interest is Russian anti-corruption to the American CIA? ZERO. So they cast Navalny as an opposition figure and gave him the job to be repressed. Navalny started holding demonstrations without a permit. (He could have gotten a permit.) The first time he got 15 days in jail and a reprimand. OK now were getting somewhere, so that hit the western news. With the 2nd unauthorized demonstration he got 30 days and a fine.
So as the new "opposition figure", Navalny's job was to get into jail, to make some western news. Follow that reasoning throughout his whole career, and it always makes sense with the circumstances. He is a figure like Juan Gerardo Guaidó, but with different job opportunities. But he was still on salary.
I would say he self-administered something given to him, to get into Germany, and then some fishy trace chemicals were discovered, somewhere down the line. No Doctor at Charité would sign off on any poisoning.
Then after disobeying his probation terms, why did he go back to Russia? Clearly, he had to get into jail to keep his salary coming. Then some of his embezzlement came to light, (or was already known), and his jail term mushroomed.
Then what happened to get him back into the news??? I don't know, but he was on a perpetual chemical diet for years, and who knows what the side effects or interactions between drugs are going to be? In this case, a brain hemorrhage. That's a worthy event, so the salary was transferred to his wife.
It is just my fantasy story, so don't try to verify it.
.
It is also interesting that Navalnya was immediately able to make a statement at the Munich Security Conference. Perfect timing or clumsy propaganda staging? I think the former confirms the latter.
https://thehill.com/policy/international/4472349-navalny-wife-speech-munich-security-conference/