On divorces and successions
Questions of morality and legacy
I am still trying, desperately, to cling onto some faith in humanity. When The Gates’ divorce was announced in 2021, like most people, I was wondering about the reasons.
It happened right in the middle of the Covid madness, when so much of his criminal corruption came to light, when it became clear that his “charity” foundation is nothing but a colossal money-making scam to give him more power and wealth. He is a philanthropath.
Against all reason and evidence, I was hoping that her conscience, her moral condemnation of his genocidal schemes may have played some role in the failing of their marriage. That she wanted to distance herself from his actions.
I don’t know why did I have this delusional hope. I don’t particularly like her, she is neither attractive nor noticeably smart, maybe it was this ‘normalcy’ that made me expect some decency from her.
She does not seem to have any problem with the next plandemic, the chemical sterilization of African women, the depopulation agenda or the obscene profits on the useless, harmful and unnecessary ‘vaccines’
In the end, the ONLY problem she seems to have, is with his sexual missteps.
And now, the Trudeaus. Same story, same hope, same sorry. At least she has some charm, but in the end, that does not matter. She must have some serious dirt on him, but I don’t think that this will ever amount to any more than a juicier divorce settlement.
Will we ever see a political divorce triggered by the moral indignation of a spouse over the partner’s immoral, illegal or even criminal behaviour? Will we ever see a whistleblower celebrity spouse?
Probably not. Marrying into fame, power and money; marrying vain, narcissist sociopaths seem to be a package deal. A deal that cannot be denounced without implying complicity.
The logic is also true for abusive relationships. I have some examples of this in my own extended family.
One must wonder how will history see people like Justin and Bill. The real question is: will it even see them at all? Will they ever be seen to be more than just the instruments of our times?
They are, for sure, instrumental. Bill Gates alienating Africa from the West and Justin Trudeau arguably creating more political division in Canada than any other prime minister in Canadian history.
History remembers ideologs, outstanding mavericks and powerful actors on the world stage.
Fidel Castro will be remembered; his bastard son not so much.
It is no accident that Bill Gates covets the Nobel prize so much. For him, it would be the ultimate validation of his self-image as a benefactor of mankind. Well, that’s how Hitler saw himself as well….
A significant aspect of my disappointment is the realization that these divorces just diverted attention from their crimes. It seems that we (collectively) are more concerned about sexual transgressions than actual crimes.
Talking about sociopaths and narcissists, I cannot possibly ignore the questions of succession at the Open Society Foundation and the World Economic Forum.
The first one is already in progress; Soros named his son Alex as the new head of the OSF. The first move of Alex was to fire 40% of the people working there and to suspend grants until February 2024.
In a letter addressed to “friends and partners,” Open Society Foundations President Mark Malloch-Brown wrote, “Technological, environmental, political, and socioeconomic shifts are challenging open society ideals around the world. This flux demands that we reimagine our philanthropy.” (source)
The issue of succession is not that pressing at the WEF, as Schwab is eight years younger than Soros – meaning he is ‘only’ 85 - , but speculations abound.
“He Has an Incredible Knack to Smell the Next Fad” (source)
“Everyone’s talking about it,” whispered one WEF strategic partner as she took her mandatory COVID test on arrival in Davos, “and the whole thing could fall apart if they don’t sort it out.”
Why is this important? Because the future of these organizations will affect all of us.
In both cases, we are talking about organizations that are quite problematic led by people with highly questionable morals.
They are working for the same goals, the destruction of Western civilization as we know it. Soros is subverting from below, creating lawlessness, corrupting the political system, corrupting the democratic process and sowing social discord with his hundreds of fake ‘grassroot’ organizations.
Schwab and the WEF is working toward a totalitarian world imposed from above, ran by globalized elite without even a shred of democracy.
Soros and Schwab are deranged sociopaths. Soros is a scheming Machiavellian with a God complex, while Schwab is a vain narcissist clown with an oversized ego that is only matched by the degree of his stupidity. (I am planning to write a series of posts about that)
These memes are NOT accidental:
The problem with narcissists and sociopaths is that the essence of their being is not inheritable or transferable.
They do not have a legacy they can pass on. They do not have a coherent ideology that can carry and mask the sinister goals behind.
They cannot say that the goal is totalitarian serfdom where we will be robbed of all of our freedoms, democracy and agency over our lives; …. and still expect us to be enthusiastic about it.
Both of these organizations run on the – for lack of a better word – ‘charisma’ of their leaders.
Money can be passed on, the organizations can continue to exist, but they will wither without leaders.
When I saw this interview with Alex Soros, I rejoiced:
He is an insecure, inarticulate idiot. With any luck, he will destroy his daddy’s legacy and the world will only be better for it.
As the Politico article (linked below) suggests, there are worries at the WEF, that without a proper succession plan, the whole institution will fall apart in some infighting for its control. The 2023 Davos meeting was already showing signs of dwindling enthusiasm.
So what’s in future of these people and institutions?
Trudeau was never more than a pathetic sock-puppet that will fade into irrelevance the moment he is out of office and will be forgotten within a year.
Gates will not get the Nobel prize and will die alone, leaving only money behind that will disappear in a few generations. His foundation will fade into irrelevance on the same timeline.
Soros does not have a legacy, his gay son will not create a dynasty and will not be able to hold onto either the organization or the money in the storm that will come after the loss of the US dollar hegemony.
Schwab has no plan, and the WEF has no plan B.
This new generation of robber barons and political dynasties don’t have the staying power of the old ones.
That’s a ray of hope for humanity.
But this is just what I think, let me know if you disagree.
I am comfortable with the role of Cassandra.
= = = = = = = =