Why dishonest. All politics involves coalition and compromise; and sometimes -- when you need to tip a structurally rigged system, opening up new possibilities -- you need to compromise even more.
Libertarianism has little overlap with socialism. But the existing state-centred, collectivist social compact could be steered to something more bottom up and communitarian...rooted in place-bound relationships. Social catholic distributism would be one form....MAximising the prevalence of independent, property holding, productive households.....But none of that has a chance in the horsetrading between Libs and Cons that passes as choice
https://open.substack.com/pub/oswald67/p/ndp-collapse-creates-space-for-mcanga?r=2r3au&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
I see the point, but but I find it a bit Machiavellian, calculating and dishonest.
I consider Libertarian socialism a misguided idea.
I will try to address it at some point.
Why dishonest. All politics involves coalition and compromise; and sometimes -- when you need to tip a structurally rigged system, opening up new possibilities -- you need to compromise even more.
Libertarianism has little overlap with socialism. But the existing state-centred, collectivist social compact could be steered to something more bottom up and communitarian...rooted in place-bound relationships. Social catholic distributism would be one form....MAximising the prevalence of independent, property holding, productive households.....But none of that has a chance in the horsetrading between Libs and Cons that passes as choice