I like this final paragraph in Bruce Parady's essay on "Anatomy of the Administrative State."
"The King's absolute power served him, not his subjects. People who beleive the administrative state is different have been hoodwinked. By debating the niceties of policy, we quibble in the margins and surrender the battlefield. "Give us liberty," we might say, "or just do what you think best." Patrick Henry would not be impressed.
If they get their news from MSM, how would they even know? And even if they knew, they would probably beleive the government is actually helping and protecting them. Most were ever taught the importance of 'free speech.'
I like this final paragraph in Bruce Parady's essay on "Anatomy of the Administrative State."
"The King's absolute power served him, not his subjects. People who beleive the administrative state is different have been hoodwinked. By debating the niceties of policy, we quibble in the margins and surrender the battlefield. "Give us liberty," we might say, "or just do what you think best." Patrick Henry would not be impressed.
The way I see the problem, the window of allowable opinions is getting smaller all the time.
Blackmailing social companies to do the unconstitutional dirty work of censoring.
Yet nobody seems to bat an eye.
If they get their news from MSM, how would they even know? And even if they knew, they would probably beleive the government is actually helping and protecting them. Most were ever taught the importance of 'free speech.'